Letters to the editor - December 1

December 1 2017 - 4:07pm
Letters to the Editor – December 1
Letters to the Editor – December 1

Palliative care not euthanasia

The euthanasia bill recently passed the upper house with the support of local MP James Purcell. Lower house MP, dairyfarmer and one-time nurse Roma Britnell also supported the bill. I want to thank both MPs for graciously meeting with me prior to the vote. However, I also want to put on the public record (for my descendants seven generations hence) that I literally begged them both to vote no to what I believe is an extremely dangerous, misguided medical experiment and societal recalibration. The specific issue I put to both MPs is that wrongful, intentional, state-sponsored deaths are 100 per cent certain in systems of euthanasia. That’s why euthanasia is everyone’s business, not just the business of the individual. The specific question I put to both MPs was – How many and what percentage of wrongful deaths in a state-sponsored program are you willing to accept?  At worst, people will die due to coercion from people who are meant to care for them, with elder abuse becoming increasingly recognized and likely rising in our community. Subtle and non sinister external pressure can occur when carers are not coping themselves with a loved ones situation. Even in the most supportive families, the terminally ill will now forever have to decide if they should "do the right thing” and end it all for everyone’s sake. The right to die for a multimillionaire euthanasia advocate is the obligation to volunteer for the vulnerable. Medical mistakes occur in systems of euthanasia, just like any medical system. People with undiagnosed and potentially treatable mental illness (as well as a terminal illness) will die wrongful deaths under this program. People with the incorrect diagnosis and incorrect prognosis will also die when they shouldn’t. Up to five per cent of post mortems reveal a different diagnosis to what was proposed prior to death. No system, safeguard or legislation can allow for the state-sponsored deaths of some in the name of compassion, whilst claiming to simultaneously prevent the wrongful deaths of the vulnerable, which are certain to occur as part of such a process. Euthanasia can’t be made safe,​ no matter how many “safeguards” you put in place. It is naive, arrogant or both to believe otherwise, with something so complicated as the human condition. Unfortunately for Victoria our own MPs have collectively reached a different conclusion. Emotion trumps reason. At present palliative care is not available to 25 per cent of Victorians. Your government will help you kill yourself but will not give you the care you need to relieve your suffering. We are then supposed to believe this is all about choice. Mr Purcell recently described himself as a “Spring Street deal maker”. It would be good if he could tell The Standard readers if he has indeed made a deal with Daniel Andrews with regards to delivering euthanasia and what that deal may involve. Local voters need to fully understand they actually Voted 1 "euthanasia" when they thought they were voting for local jobs. I also wish to ask Ms Britnell to stop complaining about the Andrews government and the local train. If she thinks Mr Andrews can run a euthanasia program for our fellow citizens it stands to reason he should be left alone to run the more than occasional late train. 

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Warrnambool news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.