News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 HOUSES OR HEIFERS?: Saleyards report 

HOUSES OR HEIFERS?: Saleyards report

16 Mar, 2010 08:44 AM
IF Warrnambool's municipal livestock selling centre was closed the city council could reap at least $9 million by selling the site and its portion of the adjacent buffer zone.

And if all the 50-hectare buffer zone was opened, up to 600 houses worth an estimated $165m could potentially be made available, according to a special report released today.

The report, released ahead of next Monday's city council meeting to decide the yards' future, outlines options to be considered in one of the most contentious decisions in the city's recent history.

Saleyards have been part of the council's operation since 1883 and have been on the Caramut Road site for almost 40 years.

The venture has been at the centre of controversy for about two years, after private company Victorian Livestock Exchange (VLE) approached the council with its plans for a $10m regional livestock centre - first at Garvoc and later at Cudgee.

The council is grappling with expanding housing estates creeping towards the yards and whether to hand its role in the livestock selling sector over to private enterprise.

Councillors discussed the issue in a private committee meeting last night and decided to make public a lengthy report prepared by council officers.

However, the officers’ recommendations for the vote will not be revealed until closer to the meeting.

The report gives a market valuation prepared in August 2007 which shows the 7.8-hectare saleyards site off Caramut Road was worth $5.95m if rezoned for light industry.

The council-owned 11.3ha vacant buffer zone running from the western edge of the yards to Rooneys Road was valued at $3m if it was rezoned for housing.

Land values have risen considerably since the 2007 estimation so the proceeds could be expected to be higher than the 2007 figures.

“With Warrnambool’s current shortage of industrial land and the need for additional ongoing provision of industrial land, the alternative use of the site as a business park may generate similar, or possibly greater, economic development benefits and returns to the local economy,” the report said.

In his summary, city chief executive Bruce Anson said: “Council must consider whether its involvement in the ownership and operation of livestock exchange services form part of council’s future core business.”

He said the saleyards contributed to the local and regional economy, but its location was “seriously challenged” by residential growth, environmental impact of waste, regionalisation and rationalisation of the saleyards industry and increasing responsibility for health and safety risks.

“When these issues are considered collectively the Warrnambool saleyards will no longer be in a desirable location over the medium to long term,” he said.

“Council must be proactive and opportunistic in developing a strategy to ensure that state-of-the-art saleyard facilities are available to agents, buyers and producers in the Warrnambool and wider region.”

The report said growth in the area would limit the saleyards at its current site to only another five to 10 years and a suitable alternative site was unlikely to be found within the city boundaries, while a $7m capital expenditure would be needed to upgrade the yards long-term.

An economic impact study in 2008 estimated a $13.7m loss in annual business turnover in the local economy if the yards closed, but this week’s report says if new regional saleyards opened within 20 kilometres of Warrnambool the spin-off economic benefits for the city could be similar or greater than now.

VLE has recently told the council and stock agents it would be willing to investigate a site even closer to Warrnambool than the Cudgee-Panmure land it has already purchased for the venture.

However, agents have continued their campaign against the VLE plan, preferring the Caramut Road site which they estimate could be upgraded for far less that the council’s $7m figure.

The report will be available from the city council’s website, www.warrnambool.vic.gov.au, from noon today.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We needed a report to tell us the blindingly obvious? The land around the Stockyards is valuable housing land. What a waste of ratepayers money. The issue surely should be decided on what is convenient for the users of the Stockyards and from what I can judge the current position is the most comvenient. Council needs to realise that Warrnambool is in the country and therefore we need facilities for farmers. It seems to me the Stockyards are not broken so why fix them? And in light of this" special" report keep your greedy hands off the land.
Posted by chmw, 16/03/2010 9:25:28 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard
It would be in the best interest for the council retain ownership of the salesyards but why couldn't it be relocated to the property purchased by council for its intended Light Industrial Park near Allansford. Giving them the options of making something back on the wasted exercise of purchasing that land. And still utilsing the land at the current site for preferably housing (which would also remove the requirement of the buffer zone thereby reducing the cost of new infa structure on the rate payers) or if its not riddled with cave then light industrial which also requires an impact to ensure effected run-off doesn’t contamiante the waterway
Posted by Wayne, 16/03/2010 10:21:01 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard
If chmw had his/her way, the saleyards would still be located at their original Swan Reserve site in the centre of the city. Get real, Warrnambool's City Council should have no role in running a livestock selling operation. Council's attention is needed in so many other fields. Bruce Anson is right. The saleyards location is seriously challenged by residential growth, environmental impact of waste, regionalisation and rationalisation of the saleyards industry and increasing responsibility for health and safety risks. When these issues are considered collectively the Warrnambool saleyards are no longer in a desirable location. Council has far greater priorities. Bite the bullet and shift the saleyards now.
Posted by futurist, 16/03/2010 10:22:43 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard
'Chmw' seems to have a few heifers loose in the top paddock. Convenience is not an adequate reason to keep the saleyards in Warrnambool, or else they would never have been shifted from their historic Swan Reserve site. They moved then because the city was encroaching, and it's little wonder that this issue has flared agin. The fact is that we live in a busy city and Council needs to put quality of life and land affordability for residents above 'convenience' for saleyards users, who for the most-part live outside our city boundaries anyway. Chmw, you whinge about Council funding a study into alternative use of our community-owned saleyards land, yet the study reveals that we can raise $9 million from their sale to lower rates or improve civic infrastructure. Not only that, but Council then no longer needs to invest in saleyard upgrades because VLE will build a new state-of-the-art facility at no public expense at the edge of town! That seems like a win, win, win situation to me. Of course, the stock agents lose out by having to commute 10 miles to Cudgee and that's tough for them... I hear that buying a decent coffee is terribly inconvenient out there in the country.
Posted by Ms Wilma Wright, 16/03/2010 4:08:44 PM, on The Warrnambool Standard
I am in favour of the Sale yards moving, they need to be bigger and better to support the future selling in the area. Im not sure a site a Cudgee is the answer but l would see a much better use of the land at Caramut Road.
Posted by thowie711, 16/03/2010 4:20:38 PM, on The Warrnambool Standard
Get a grip townies, Warrnambool’s economy relies on Agriculture. Take the farmers and their money out of the equation and Warrnambool’s businesses will suffer. Good luck filling those houses when there’s no agricultural based businesses left to employ people in Warrnambool.
Posted by aggie, 17/03/2010 10:51:45 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard
And I suppose, 'Aggie', that you believe that agricultural businesses will flee the city if the saleyards relocate 15 kms from their present site to Cudgee? I'd suggest there is a greater chance of agricultural businesses closing if the Council chooses to keep the present saleyards open, fails to upgrade them in the medium term and subsequently sees farmers take their cattle to sale at new facilities in Ballarat, and Mt. Gambier. The reality is that upgrading the present saleyards will never be a high priority for city spending, and nor should it be as Warrnambool is a lifestyle city. Council should focus upon delivering municipal services, and let VLE focus upon their core business of selling livestock.
Posted by Ms Wilma Wright, 18/03/2010 3:46:27 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard
“Lifestyle living” is that an industry that employ’s, pay’s bills, puts food on the table and sustains a community? If a business’s customer base up and moves it has little choice but to move with them or shut up shop. What is more concerning is that the sale and or removal of the saleyards may just be the start of a systematic removal of agricultural entities that directly employ a large part of the Warrnambool community and indirectly support and employ the remainder, to make way for “lifestyle living”. Perhaps “lifestyle living” could have a spin off cottage industry “synthetic food manufacture” imagine that milk that really does come from a carton not a cow!
Posted by aggie, 19/03/2010 8:01:09 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

TAFE - MREC's



The Warrnambool Standard







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...