News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Corangamite mayor justifies budget outlay 

Corangamite mayor justifies budget outlay

28 Jan, 2012 04:00 AM
CORANGAMITE Shire Council has defended its expenditure of $150,000 on a tourism opportunities study and planning panel review hearing.

“We are not going to apologise for investing in the future of an important industry to create jobs and opportunities,” mayor Matt Makin told The Standard yesterday in response to criticism by ratepayers.

“There are always pressures on budget, but council unanimously determined this is a high priority issue.”

The panel’s report last week said four coastal sites identified by the study for new high-end tourism accommodation should not be rezoned.

Another 16 potential sites for tourism ventures gained the nod.

Budget figures tabled at the council’s meeting on Tuesday night showed $137,000 was spent on legal fees and panel costs for three recent planning amendment proposals. About $115,000 of that was for the tourism issue hearing conducted over four days at Camperdown late last year, shire chief executive Andrew Mason confirmed yesterday.

The shire hired a barrister, an instructing solicitor and four expert witnesses.

That comes on top of the council’s $35,000 contribution to the $100,000 tourism study conducted about two years ago by consultants with grants from the state government and Tourism Victoria.

Timboon’s Neil Trotter, who was among 99 submitters to the panel, has described the exercise as a waste of ratepayers’ money.

“The issues are far broader than just accommodation. I’ve written to the Planning Minister,” he said.

“Marketing is the biggest problem.

“Tourists come down on one-day visits and leave their effluent and rubbish, but very little else to benefit the region.”

Councillors are likely to vote on the panel report next month or March to decide if they will accept, challenge or amend the recommendations.

It will then be referred to Planning Minister Matthew Guy for a determination.

Cr Makin said tourism was a key industry and the council would not shy away from supporting moves to attract more visitors.

“The level of our expenditure is exactly the reason why we are seeking planning amendments,” he said.

“It would be almost prohibitive costs for individual developers to do the amendment process themselves.”

Cr Makin said the study identified opportunities for new tourism accommodation, particularly for the luxury conference and coach tour market.

“It’s a chicken and egg type thing. You are not going to get numbers until the product is there,” he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Lets see a breakdown of how that $100,000 was spent on the tourism study. Thats an expensive research study!

Who and how was the lead consultant doing the study, and why did they spend more than the industry average of $5,000 for a study.

A lot of the research on tourism is provided free from the gov & industry bodies every year just by asking.

As a market research consultant, that would have bought you a team of two researchers for over 12 weeks fulltime researching and a detailed report.

I would love to see this $100,000 report from this study to see what we paid for.

Posted by Agreed, 28/01/2012 8:27:27 AM, on The Warrnambool Standard

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

TAFE - MREC's



The Warrnambool Standard







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...